A Time To Love, A Time To Di

“The religious impulse is a deep-seated human inclination to seek meaning through a connection with something perceived as supernatural or transcendent. It can manifest as a desire for purpose, an interest in immortality, a yearning for the sacred, or a need to understand the origins of existence. This impulse is seen as a fundamental aspect of human nature that has influenced history, culture, and individual behaviour. 

It often stems from a rejection of the idea that life is a mere accident, leading to a search for a larger purpose or a relationship with a higher power.”

As such it is the highest thing that man can aspire to.

Which makes it a tragedy that this impulse has been usurped, manipulated and almost destroyed by all the organised religions of this world.

Very few people have read the Bible without “guidance” from their “spiritual superiors”.

It is almost impossible to do so without the conditioning heaped on us over the last two thousands years from people who claim to be religious teachers but are actually just politicians seeking to control this impulse for their own ends.

If we could genuinely put aside all this nonsense and read it innocently, we would find insights that fit very well with the astrological/spiritual view of the Universe.

“Ecclesiastes 3 verses 1-8 describes a “time to love and a time to die”. This passage, a well-known poem, states that there is a specific season for every activity under heaven, including both positive and negative experiences. The verses say there is “a time to tear down and a time to build,” “a time to weep and a time to laugh,” “a time to mourn and a time to dance,” “a time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing,” “a time to love and a time to hate,” and “a time for war and a time for peace”. 

So why would any organisation that believes this reject the one thing that would tell us when those times might be?

Because not knowing when these times might come inevitably results in fear and apprehension, and when people are afraid, they are much easier for politicians to control.

Astrology simply tells us when it’s time to do all these things so that we can live in harmony with creation rather than fight against it.

The stars can tell us when it’s time to be born, when it’s time to die and now with the science of secondary progressions, even when it’s time to be born again.

This is part of a series of articles focusing on the UK Royal Family detailing their soul group connections and proving that Elizabeth, Philip and Charles are reincarnations of their own great, great grandparents Victoria, Albert and Edward 7th.

For more information on this see The Instantaneous Acceleration Of X And Y, A Right Royal Progress, That Was A Killer, Queen, We Return To Be Amazed, Not Amused and Scorpio Will Be The Death Of You

In the last one, I discussed Edward 7th and his crowded love life.

This was identified by his T square.

Marriage is a 7th house themes, and Edward’s view of the sanctity of it can be seen from his South Node in Leo there, which suggests lessons to be learnt around entitlement.

The 7th house ruler, Mercury is retrograde and in detriment, in Sagittarius where it demands freedom to roam wherever it wishes.

So what about the long suffering spouse then?

Princess Alexandra also has the South Node in the 7th house and her 7th house ruler, Venus is closely square to Saturn so there was clearly a lot of learning going on.

Like her husband, Alexandra also had a T square with a 9th house personal planet opposite a slow mover and focused on apex 1st house placement.

The difference between them being the placements involved.

Edward’s contained an exact opposition between Venus in Libra in the 9th house, Pluto and an apex Mars in the 1st house which showed a fondness for threesomes in Parisian brothels.

Alexandra’s Moon in Leo in the 9th opposite Neptune and an apex Scorpio Ascendant, suggested getting married to a foreign king, losing her dignity but keeping quiet about it.

Edward’s Sun is conjunct Alexandra’s Ascendant and tightly square her Moon, so it’s pretty clear who we are talking about.

As mentioned earlier, Edward came back as Charles bringing another apex 1st house T Square with him.

Just like his last time out, Charles had Venus in Libra but the fact that it was sextile Pluto rather than dramatically opposed to it, toned down the cheating considerably.

Venus conjunction with Neptune is a bit Mills and Boon, rather than Edward’s Mars/Pluto aspects which was more Penthouse.

Charles’ wife did not have anything like as much to put up with as Edward’s but it hurt just as much, if not more.

Maybe that’s because a young girl with the Sun in Cancer in the 7th house would have bought the whole Disney princess dream.

Like Alexandra, Diana had a fixed sign T square of her own, also involving the Moon opposite an outer planet but her apex placement was quite different.

Where a Scorpio Ascendant bore Edward’s rampant infidelity stoically, Diana’s apex Venus in Taurus in the 5th house would use it to gain even more publicity for herself.

Maybe Diana had learnt from past experience and was determined to expose her husband’s cheating.

Is it possible that she was a reincarnation of the long suffering princess of Denmark?

Let’s regress her chart to Alexandra’s birthdate and see.

Diana’s regressed Moon in December 1844 was exactly conjunct her Neptune.

Given that many of Alexandra’s husband troubles stemmed from a Leo Moon opposite her Neptune, that link is more than a little interesting.

Diana’s regressed Moon is also exactly trine her 7th house Sun.

Her regressed Mercury is right in her T square, exactly conjunct her current life Moon and within 3 minutes of a square to her apex Venus.

Her regressed Venus is exactly sextile her Moon.

And her regressed Mars is closely conjunct her 7th house Mercury.

This lot is certainly suggesting a connection.

But we can’t look at Diana’s life with focusing on the D word.

Ever since she was born, she heard the name Di, as if the Universe was preparing her for her own demise.

And when that death came, it probably gained more attention than any other in history.

It is clearly indicated in her chart.

In this article published 10 years ago – Princess Diana’s Death – Why? I explain why.

“The Moon in Aquarius meant that Diana’s emotional family seemed to include everyone and she had an extraordinary ability to relate to and empathise with all types of people. This was undoubtedly why her untimely death touched so many people profoundly.

Her Moon is opposite Uranus. Uranus rules the media, particularly in the modern TV age, it’s symbol even looks like a TV aerial. The media followed her around like nobody ever before or since and the term paparazzi was largely unknown before she came on the scene.

A lot of this was probably to do with Diana’s openness as an Aquarian Moon (English Royal Moons since the war have been in much more restrained or traditional signs like Taurus, Cancer, Leo, Virgo and Scorpio) so the media recognised an opportunity and went after it big time.

The opposition between Diana’s Moon and Uranus focuses onto the T square apex point of Venus in Taurus and the media created this image of one of the most beautiful women in the world and certainly the most photographed. Billions of people bought into this projected image and she was a globally recognised iconic figure.

If we accept that the media in Diana’s chart is represented by Uranus the circumstances of her death become clearer.  It can also help to think of Diana as being represented by her Moon.

Uranus is at 23 degrees Leo and the media was always following Diana around as her Moon was at 25 degrees of the opposite sign Aquarius.

Traditionally, Astrology has placed death in the 8th house of a chart, and planets in this house can say something about the nature of a person’s death, particularly if it is unusual.

In Diana’s 8th house there is a conjunction of Mars with Pluto and also with Uranus.  In fact Mars and Pluto are together in Virgo and Uranus is just behind the pair in Leo, the sign before.  All this is happening opposite Diana’s Moon.

Mars is the principle of personal drive so we have to see it’s role here as driving.

Pluto as we know is all about sudden, unexpected change that always has life transforming affects, it is the planet of death and rebirth. It also rules the underworld. 

Mars conjunct Pluto and Uranus in the 8th house opposite the Moon is telling us that Princess Diana (Moon) would die (8th) in a car crash (Mars) in an underground tunnel (Pluto) being pursued by the media (Uranus).

The symbols clearly point to the tragic event. So when would all this happen?

 Given the significance of the event you might expect Pluto transiting to the Sun, but whilst Pluto/Sun contacts do mark major periods of death and rebirth within a person’s life it’s seldom that they mark their actual death.

Pluto is with Mars in the chart so the thing to do would be to see when Pluto makes another aspect with that Mars/Pluto conjunction. It does, in fact make only one in  Diana’s lifetime a square aspect which was in operation in 1996 – 98.  Princess Diana died on the 31st August 1997.”

When I wrote that article, I wasn’t looking at Secondary Progressions, in fact this is the first time I have checked Diana’s progressed chart for her death.

Diana tragically died at the age of 36, far too young for her progressed Sun to form any conjunctions.

Her progressed Venus, however had made its first one, a conjunction with her Mercury.

But the one of real significance was her progressed Moon.

The Moon forms a tight Yod (about 1/2 degree orb) with Uranus and an apex Saturn.

As the Yod is so strongly linked with death and it triggers her natal Moon’s opposition with Uranus in the 8th house of death, this is obviously the progressed marker of her tragic accident.

As death is such a powerful theme for Diana, we would naturally expect it to be evident in her last life as well as her most recent one.

So how about Diana’s regressions for Alexandra’s death in November 1925?

This is astonishing.

Diana’s regressed Sun is exactly (4 minute orb) square to Pluto.

Given Pluto’s 8th house position in Diana’s natal chart and its obvious role in her own death, this is the one regression we would expect to see in a previous death.

The odd of this occurring by chance are 675/1 against.

What about a regression to May 1910, the date of Edward’s death?

Here Diana’s regressed Sun is square to Uranus (1 degree orb), the other 8th house death trigger in her natal chart.

As well as Uranus and Pluto, there are two other placements in Diana’s 8th house, Mars at 1.38 Virgo and the North Node at 28.10 Leo.

There was one other tragic event in the life of Princess Alexandra between the time of Edward’s death and her own.

Her nephew Tsar Nicholas II of Russia was overthrown by the Bolsheviks and he, his wife and their children were executed in July 1918.

If we regress Diana’s chart to that date, both her Mars and North Node are triggered.

Diana’s regressed Sun is exactly square to her North Node.

Her regressed Mars forms an exact opposition with Jupiter.

This is all looking very convincing evidence of a past life connection.

What about Alexandra?

If we progress her chart forward 1.5 centuries to the death of Diana, would we see anything that might point to it?

On that fateful night in Paris, Alexandra’s progressed Mars is exactly (1/4 degree orb) conjunct her Saturn.

Her progressed Moon is exactly (orb 7 minutes) conjunct her Uranus.

When we remember that Diana’s own progressions for her death involve an exact Yod between the Moon, Saturn and Uranus, we are clearly seeing her death in Alexandra’s as well.

So with all this evidence, Diana Princess of Wales, consort of Charles and mother of the next king is a reincarnation of Alexandra, Princess and consort of Edward, Charles own great, great grandfather (and earlier incarnation) and mother of King George V.

Diana has been gone almost 30 years.

While I was writing this article, a clear thought occurred to me that Diana might already have come back in a new life.

If I was doing a future life progression for Diana, I would look for a rebirth when there would be an aspect of her progressed Sun to her 4th house ruler.

This would be Mars at 1.38 Virgo.

Diana’s progressed Sun would reach a conjunction with it in 2015. There was one very important person born in that year.

In May 2015 Diana’s progressed Sun was conjunct her Mars.

Her progressed Venus was sextile itself (1/4 degree).

Her progressed Moon was quincunx her Sun (orb 3 minutes).

The person born on that day was Diana’s granddaughter, Princess Charlotte.

 

With her Mars exactly conjunct Diana’s Venus and Ascendant very close to Diana’s Sun, Princess Charlotte could well be her grandmother making a comeback.

If so, she also has a T square with the Moon opposite Uranus.

You would expect Diana to return not least to further investigate some unresolved relationship themes and Charlotte’s T square has an apex 7th house Pluto, so there is plenty of room for that there.

Let’s regress Charlotte’s chart back to the date of Diana’s birth.

In July 1961, Charlotte’s regressed Venus and Ascendant were in her T Square, were exactly opposite her natal Moon.

And what about a regression to the Paris tunnel?

Was Charlotte in the car at the time?

Charlotte’s regressed Mars was closely conjunct her Sun.

Her regressed Venus was exactly opposite her Saturn.

This is interesting when we remember that Alexandra’s progressions to the same date include Mars conjunction her Saturn.

Charlotte’s middle name is Diana. Royal fans and media have pointed out a striking physical resemblance between the young princess and her grandmother, especially in childhood photos.

From all of the above, we can see the reason why.

We could maybe go back even further but it seems that the soul that was Diana has been close to the British throne at least three times.

As Alexandra she was mother of the King (George V) as Diana she soon will be (William V).

It’s not inconceivable that Charlotte would be too in time, if the Windsors are still going then.

Whichever way it goes, we can’t expect it to be plain sailing.

Alexandra had her Moon in a T Square opposite Neptune, Diana had it in one opposite Uranus, Charlotte also has it in one opposite Uranus.

Some pretty choppy life waves there, but we have to recognise that each one has been chosen by this returning soul.

It’s arguable that in her 36 years, Diana experienced all the “times” described in Ecclesiastes but it seems her soul has still chosen to keep coming back.

Death is not the end. It just takes us back to the life surfers car park, where we discard our dripping wetsuits, have a quick review with our mates and head home for a well earned rest and in order to plan our time to love again. 

Posted on 21 November 2025

YOU CAN BOOK YOUR OWN PERSONAL ASTROLOGY CONSULTATION HERE


HAVE YOU BEEN HERE BEFORE – ASTROLOGICAL REGRESSION AND PAST LIVES

YOUR PAST AND PRESENT FAMILY PACKAGE – UNDERSTANDING THE PATTERNS

YOUR SOULMATE SYNASTRY – PAST AND PRESENT


TREAT YOURSELF – REMEDIES INDIVIDUALLY TAILORED TO YOUR BIRTHCHART AND TRANSITS


PROGRESSED LIFE SUPPORT – WHEN WILL YOUR SOULMATE BE COMING ?


WHAT’S HAPPENING MAN ? USING HORARY TO ANSWER ALL YOUR QUESTIONS


HOW TO CHANGE YOUR FATE – USING ELECTIONS TO ENSURE THE BEST POSSIBLE OUTCOME FOR EVERY VENTURE